The family of jailed leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, has disagreed with the recent judgment delivered by Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja.
In a statement issued on Monday and signed by Emmanuel Kanu on behalf of the Okwu Kanu family, the family said it was speaking “with heavy hearts but absolute clarity” regarding the court’s decision.
They noted that “we raised several legal points in court, including Section 36(12) of the Constitution, Supreme Court decisions on repealed laws, and previous directives related to earlier charges.”
The family emphasised the importance of constitutional safeguards, stating, “No person shall be convicted unless the offence is defined in a written law in force at the time,” and added that previous Supreme Court rulings support this principle.
Regarding the legal reasoning applied in the ruling, the family said, “We have concerns about the application of transition or savings clauses and how they relate to this case.”
The statement also addressed the court’s reliance on a transition or savings clause, noting that it may not apply because, in the family’s view, “Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s matter was not pending.”
They added, “The Court of Appeal discharged and acquitted him. That decision terminated all charges,” and explained that the subsequent charges before Justice Omotosho initiated “a new case, commencing de novo.”
Regarding the hierarchy of legal authority, the statement added, “No transition clause can override Section 36. No statute can override the Constitution. No judge can override the Supreme Court.”
The statement concluded with a call for adherence to the Constitution and established legal processes, noting, “All proceedings should align with existing laws and procedures.”
PUNCH Online had reported that the Federal High Court in Abuja sentenced the IPOB leader to life imprisonment
The presiding judge handed down the sentence on counts one, two, four, five, and six, opting for life imprisonment instead of the death penalty.
He also handed Kanu a 20-year jail term on count three, with no option of fine, and a five-year jail term on count seven, with no option of fine.
Justice Omotosho delivered the judgment after convicting Kanu on all seven counts of terrorism offences.
